Comments on: Vimeo and the Parable of the Photo Enforcement Camera https://daredreamer.com/vimeo-and-the-parable-of-the-photo-enforcement-camera/ The Sites & Sounds of Creative Expression Fri, 23 May 2014 15:46:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/vimeo-and-the-parable-of-the-photo-enforcement-camera/#comment-1175 Fri, 23 May 2014 15:46:18 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=22951#comment-1175 In reply to jeremyw.

I absolutely agree with you Jeremy. FYI, the point of a parable is usually to address one specific point. This story doesn’t address the execution of the photo enforcement camera, just the frustration of the driver at the audacity for the government to install one in the first place. There are a lot of filmmakers who are like this driver. That’s to whom I’m addressing.

I also use temp tracks and would not want those bounced. I have also had videos with legally licensed music flagged on YT. Very frustrating indeed. At least Vimeo is acknowledging that problem and promising to work to mitigate it. Only time will tell if it works.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

]]>
By: jeremyw https://daredreamer.com/vimeo-and-the-parable-of-the-photo-enforcement-camera/#comment-1174 Fri, 23 May 2014 14:21:01 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=22951#comment-1174 Good point, but there is a valid difference between bouncing a video with temp track music for client/partner review and removing deliberate copyright infringers. And it sounds like their system is automated and makes no distinction at all. I have nothing against their system, but if I’ve got written permission from a band or am using stock music I’ve purchased, then those videos should never be bounced.

]]>