Comments on: Best Wedding Highlights EVER! https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/ The Sites & Sounds of Creative Expression Tue, 08 May 2012 17:47:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: Hennflix is my Youtube channel, Custom Video Connection is my San Jose Video Production Company, specializing in Promotional Corporate Video Production, Weddings & Events https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2502 Tue, 08 May 2012 17:47:13 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2502 yeah I’ve learned wedding video guys LOVE to make a big deal outta nothing… hahahah Lighten up folks….hilarious

]]>
By: The Making of Mo Squad | Dare Dreamer Magazine https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2501 Tue, 08 May 2012 12:00:45 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2501 […] Yesterday I posted what I declared to be “the best wedding highlights video ever.” By now you realize that was all just a ruse. It was actually a clever commercial for a mosquito control company. […]

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2500 Tue, 08 May 2012 03:10:47 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2500 In reply to Steve M..

Well more than one person got it. 🙂 Saying, “At least one person got it” is a just figure of speech.

]]>
By: Steve M. https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2499 Tue, 08 May 2012 03:07:53 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2499 In reply to Leonard Hasemann.

Well, if only one person got it…..there you go.

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2498 Tue, 08 May 2012 01:33:30 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2498 In reply to Leonard Hasemann.

First, thanks so much for your kind words. I do strive for that.

And no, the twitter drama isn’t P. pushing buttons. 🙂 I got numerous tweets from various peeps not “getting it”. Some people were telling me on twitter that it’s not a wedding video but a commercial about bugs. I have a theory as to what happened that I will share tomorrow with the follow up.

I’m glad at least one person got it. 😉

]]>
By: Leonard Hasemann https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2497 Tue, 08 May 2012 01:08:00 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2497 Good Grief! Ron, I’ve always found your satire to be extremely entertaining as well as provocative to engage us in such a way to “Question Ourselves”… A call to action if you will… Please tell me that the twitter “Drama” I’m reading is P. just pushing your buttons and having a little fun…?

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2496 Mon, 07 May 2012 21:18:48 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2496 In reply to Steve M..

It is a commercial. I was joking when calling it a highlights.

]]>
By: Steve M. https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2495 Mon, 07 May 2012 21:15:46 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2495 Very clever! But I’m also kinda confused if that is a commercial or a highlight? It’s the Mosquito Squad thing that throws in the question mark. Either way, it’s very well done.
You gotta admit, Ron, if you didn’t preface this as a wedding highlight 99.9% of anyone looking at it would perceive it as a commercial.

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2494 Mon, 07 May 2012 14:05:50 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2494 In reply to Nicholas.

Really? That wasn’t a wedding highlights? Are you sure? There was a bride and groom? 😉

]]>
By: Nicholas https://daredreamer.com/best-wedding-highlights-ever/#comment-2493 Mon, 07 May 2012 13:46:00 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=8146#comment-2493 lol, funny! You got my hopes up I was expecting something amazing but alas I wouldn’t say it qualify’s as a wedding highlight at all. That’s clearly an advertisement which happened to be set around a wedding. They could have been more creative with their concept, you can do so many things with that. Title is a bit misleading.

]]>