Comments on: Another Threat an FCPX-powered User Base Means to Small Pro Videographers https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/ The Sites & Sounds of Creative Expression Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:00:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: Demand for Video: The Good News and Bad News | Dare Dreamer Magazine https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4820 Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:00:51 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4820 […] he captures audio (at least he recognizes the importance of good audio), etc. And as programs like FCPX become more powerful and more accessible to the average Joe, you can expect even more DIY videos to […]

]]>
By: The Benefits of Knowing and Serving Your Audience | Dare Dreamer Magazine https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4819 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:01:25 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4819 […] a much bigger audience (i.e. market) for beginners than experts. Apple’s development of FCPX is proof of that. View This Poll LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", […]

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4818 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:41:49 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4818 In reply to vonham.

Thanks for your comment. I agree we’re heading for a change with respect to businesses doing video on the cheap. But I don’t think that’s what has got professional editors pissed off. They’re mad because they have thousands (in some cases maybe tens of thousands) of dollars invested in equipment and labor in FCP and Apple just cut them off. But everything else you said is right on the money.

]]>
By: vonham https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4817 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:13:24 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4817 I think you may have hit the nail on the head. And this is really why video “pros” are scoffing at FCPX because it represents the sea change coming to video post production. It represents a threat to their livelihoods. Let’s face it.. if you can grab a DSLR, shoot and edit a decent product, and post directly to Vimeo or Youtube for consumption, why pay the extra bucks. I work in the broadcast industry and I can tell you the audience has a very high threshold for “quality” when it comes to product. Most people look at a product and say “wow, neat!” They don’t care the camera used or the edit platform. 99% of them could care less. I got this lesson quick when I first bought my own gear 11 years ago. A prospective client asked me if I could produce a video for his business. I said “Sure! I just bought….” and went on to explain my gear and what it could do. He looked at me glassy eyed and said “I don’t know what any of that is.. I just need a video..(so on and so forth). If you can shoot decent video you can hire a 15-year-old to work miracles in FCPX to give a wiz-bang end product. Post it to Vimeo.. link it to the client’s website. Done! That’s where this is rapidly all heading.

]]>
By: k9sound https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4816 Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:49:36 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4816 Interesting that a couple days before FCPX was released, Yahoo cited post-production services as one of the top 10 doomed industries. (http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/112946/doomed-industries-bnet).

The doom seems to coincide with Apple’s intent and your blog fortifies that sentiment. Post-production pros need to be concerned. I’ve generally served indie, small biz and non-profits doing mostly production (sound or sound-and-video), with some post dabbled in. Often these entities are short-staffed with personnel already doing double-duty with no time for DIY.

Hence, I surmise there’s a significant market for production & post for those willing to work on low-to-mid budgets. The big-bucks pros, unfortunately, might not be receptive of this concept. I know people who invested heavily into video production and post equipment that is already passe (hardware is short-lived), but were entrepreneurial enough to capitalize on it when it was in vogue.

My video hardware investment is relatively small and scalable, but it too will be obsolete in a year, so I’m always trying to juggle expenditures with profits. I think each person in this industry needs to assess for themselves how to grapple with these changes.

]]>
By: Bob Palmer https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4815 Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:50:49 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4815 Ron,
I think you may be right about the small businesses. I might suggest taking that one step farther. I have been shooting and editing news for a huge broadcasting company for many years now. We are using Adobe CS5 and it has worked pretty well. We currently have nine edit bays with six more planned. To pay for all this new hardware my company, as many have done, are slashing overtime and personnel hiring. What to do? I went out bought a new iMac, Sony NX5U camera and just installed FCPX. The purpose…wait for it…shoot economical videos for local businesses websites. I think the notion that this new software being aimed more at a consumer group is a bit premature.

Bob Palmer

]]>
By: How and How Much to Charge for Travel « The Art & Business of Filmmaking & Photography https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4814 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:25:23 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4814 […] Posts I'm Sure the Clients Loved It, But…A Quick Primer on Using Zeiss CP.2 Cinema LensesAnother Threat an FCPX-powered User Base Means to Small Pro VideographersFCPX and the Problem with CreativesFCPX and the Death of Final Cut Pro 7 is All Vincent Laforet's […]

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4813 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:49:49 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4813 In reply to Nic justice.

Agreed. I’m not saying at all people will just stop using experts. Nowhere do I say that. I’m saying that if you currently serve this market, it will be more challenging to get that business because your clients will have more confidence doing jobs themselves. As far as Starbucks, they’re a good example of what I’m talking about. I don’t think people go to Starbucks because they’re expert at making coffee. Far from it. People go to Starbucks b/c of the experience. So, despite the fact that you pay $4 for an above average cup of coffee, you go. That’s a great lesson for us. What kind of experience can we provide that will yield clients coming to us, even if our work happens to be “just okay.”

]]>
By: Nic justice https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4812 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:14:16 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4812 Your pints are very valid but people still like to be served by experts. This is the same reason Starbucks is packed everyday mostly by people who already own coffee makers.

]]>
By: FCPX and the Death of Final Cut Pro 7 is All Vincent Laforet’s Fault (or Why I think FCPX is Aimed Squarely at Photographers) « The Art & Business of Filmmaking & Photography https://daredreamer.com/another-threat-an-fcpx-powered-user-base-means-to-small-pro-videographers/#comment-4811 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 02:12:54 +0000 http://bladeronner.com/?p=4365#comment-4811 […] Posts Creating a Shot ListAnother Threat an FCPX-powered User Base Means to Small Pro VideographersFCPX and the Death of Final Cut Pro 7 is All Vincent Laforet's Fault (or Why I think FCPX is Aimed […]

]]>