Comments on: A Radical Workflow Idea for Final Cut X Users https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/ The Sites & Sounds of Creative Expression Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:01:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: Compound Clips as Projects in FCPX – My Response | Dare Dreamer Magazine https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1492 Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:01:04 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1492 […] this year I wrote about a radical workflow idea for Final Cut Pro X where you do away with the use of Projects altogether and instead use compound clips. The most […]

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1491 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:00:22 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1491 In reply to Steve M..

Thanks Steve. Much appreciated.

]]>
By: Steve M. https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1490 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:43:12 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1490 In reply to Ron Dawson.

Ah, no worries mate! It’s all good! I enjoy your podcast, and this website, thank you for that.
For the record, I just now updated to OS X 10.7 Lion, only because I had to for a new editing toy to function.

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1489 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:23:14 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1489 In reply to Steve M..

Oh, I didn’t mean you were arguing. Sorry if that’s what you thought I meant. I meant “argument” in the general sense (i.e. as in an argument with regards to a topic). I definitely appreciate you making that point and encourage the engagement. Thanks Steve.

]]>
By: Steve M. https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1488 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:41:44 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1488 In reply to Ron Dawson.

First off it’s not an argument, at least not from me. My comments are only food for thought. Of course updating right away isn’t a good idea, but the vast majority do exactly that. So, my original post is only something to consider, nothing more, nothing less.

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1487 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:48:25 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1487 In reply to Steve M..

I’ve heard argument before and here are my responses to that:

1) I never ever update mission critical software until it’s absolutely necessary. I think that’s a practice all professionals should take. It’s silly (IMHO) to update your OS or editing program the minute the new release is updated. When I do upgrade, it’s only after the bugs and issues have been worked out and I know how those bugs and/or issues will affect my work. If Apple radically changed compound clips I would know that before updating. So it’s not like I’m going to lose a bunch of work. And by that time all the projects I’ve used them on would be already delivered and archived. If the change was that radical and I found it necessary, I could always go back and then take the final versions of any Comps and drop it in a project before upgrading FCPX.

2) Frankly, I just don’t believe a feature as prominent as Compound Clips will change so radically that it would render all the previous uses of it null and void. Even the last major change they made didn’t retroactively change past projects you worked on. It was more an issue of how you used Comps moving forward. And on the off-chance they DID make the change that radical, I refer you back to point #1. 🙂

]]>
By: Steve M. https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1486 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:18:29 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1486 That is an interesting concept, and it makes total sense, the problem with it is you don’t know what Apple has in store for compound clips in future updates. If they change it’s functionality and you’ve relied on this method for multiple projects, you never know, certain changes could cause you a mountain of havoc. Is it worth the risk?

]]>
By: Ron Dawson https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1485 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:39:57 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1485 In reply to David Schmaus.

Why do you need to use Plural Eyes with FCPX? I’ve never had any issues with it’s built-in audio synching. In fact it’s pretty awesome.

]]>
By: David Schmaus https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1484 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:04:31 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1484 Found something that doesn’t work 🙁 Plural Eyes won’t allow compound clips. UGHH

]]>
By: My FCPX Workflow | Dare Dreamer Magazine https://daredreamer.com/a-radical-workflow-idea-for-final-cut-x-users/#comment-1483 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:22:51 +0000 http://daredreamermag.com/?p=9854#comment-1483 […] be sure to check out my Radical FCPX Workflow. It will blow your mind and challenge everything you thought about life, love and the pursuit of […]

]]>